The Court of Appeal held in Re A Company (CR-2024-BHM-000012) [2024] EWCA Civ 1436 that a winding up petition is not validly presented until the deposit for the Official Receiver’s fees has been paid. Practically, this judgment underscores the importance of prompt payment of the official receiver’s fees when filing a petition. Ensuring immediate payment, preferably by phone where time is critical, will avoid delays and ensure the petition is validly presented.
Litigator and insolvency lawyer Helen Rainford explores why this case serves as a timely reminder that in insolvency matters, the smallest procedural missteps can have significant legal and financial consequences.
Elements of presenting a winding up petition
Typically, one may think that there are two elements to the presentation of a winding up petition:
- The filing of the winding up petition (typically on CE-File) and paying the court filing fee
- The payment of the Official Receiver’s fees.
However, the court held that the filing of the petition is the act completed by the court and the petition is only presented upon payment of the Official Receiver’s fees.
Why is this relevant?
Under section 129 of the Insolvency Act 1986, the date of presentation represents the date on which the winding up of the company commences. As such, this date may have serious consequences for both for the company and its creditors. From this date:
- any dispositions of the company’s assets or property are void under section 127 of the Insolvency Act and provides the date from which any Insolvency Practitioner may seek to challenge any transactions entered after this date.
- the winding up petition will be listed on the court system and could become public knowledge (and is advertised in the London Gazette at a later date in any event). As a result,the company may see their bank accounts frozen, and suppliers may cease delivery.
- the company will no longer be able to appoint an administrator (if an appointment has previously been in consideration).
Key takeaways
- Practical takeaway – make payment immediately: Where possible, make payment of the Official Receivers fees (in addition to the court filing fee) as soon as the petition is filed. The Official Receiver’s fee can only be paid by cheque or over the phone. Where time is of the essence, payment over the phone could save time.
- Legal takeaway – setting a precedent and providing certainty: The court has made it clear when it views a winding up petition to have been presented and as such, any disputes around the presentation will follow the Court of Appeals ruling.
Conclusion
The decision in Re A Company (CR-2024-BHM-000012) provides crucial clarity on the moment of presentation for a winding up petition. By tying the date of presentation to the payment of the Official Receiver’s fees, the Court of Appeal has reinforced the need for procedural precision. For companies and creditors alike, understanding this ruling is vital, as it directly impacts the commencement date of a winding up, the validity of asset dispositions, and potential avenues for insolvency practitioners to challenge transactions.
The contents of this article are intended for general information purposes only and shall not be deemed to be, or constitute legal advice. We cannot accept responsibility for any loss as a result of acts or omissions taken in respect of this article.
Related insights
Give your life a legal spring clean
Life admin has a habit of slipping to the bottom of the to‑do list, but with Spring on the horizon, it’s the perfect time to refresh your legal affairs and…
Read moreSupreme Court landmark ruling reshapes unfair prejudice shareholder disputes
The Supreme Court has delivered an important judgment in THG plc v Zedra Trust Company (Jersey) Ltd, confirming that petitions under section 994 of the Companies Act 2006 are not…
Read moreSupreme Court ruling strengthens liquidators’ claims in Mitchell v Al Jaber
The decision of the Supreme Court in Mitchell v Sheikh Mohamed Bin Issa Al Jaber strengthens liquidators’ ability to pursue equitable compensation against directors for breach of their fiduciary duties….
Read moreHigh Court confirms liquidators cannot limit statutory liability
The High Court has provided important clarification on a question that has long carried practical significance for insolvency practitioners: can a liquidator limit their personal liability through contractual terms? In…
Read moreCommercial Court dismisses bank’s costs challenge following Debenhams Ottaway win
Debenhams Ottaway has successfully defended clients in a major Commercial Court costs dispute arising from long-running High Court proceedings brought by Invest Bank P.S.C. The bank had sued multiple defendants,…
Read more