A County Court Judgment (“CCJ”) secures a debt owed to a creditor, which, if not paid within twenty-eight days of the date of the judgment; will remain on the debtor’s credit file for 6 years, impacting their ability to obtain credit.
In a lot of instances, a CCJ is enough to prompt payment of the debt however, this is not guaranteed, and you should be aware of the need to enforce a judgment.
It can be extremely frustrating for a creditor, who has already spent time, effort and cost to obtain a CCJ, to then still not receive the payment owed to them. You should always start the process with an end in mind and it is sensible to consider the likeliness of obtaining payment from the debtor. Any knowledge you have of the debtor’s assets can hugely increase the chances of successful enforcement and will help when determining the best route to take.
Please see below list of enforcement options available to you in which we offer assistance for low fixed fees:
- High Court Enforcement
- Third party debt orders
- Charging orders
- Orders for sale following a charging order
- Attachment of earnings order
- Order to attend court for questioning
If you would like any further information, please do not hesitate to get in touch with us.
This article was written by Sophie Taylor, a legal assistant in our debt recovery team. For more information about high court enforcement, contact slt@debenhamsottaway.co.uk or call 01727 735632.
The contents of this article are intended for general information purposes only and shall not be deemed to be, or constitute legal advice. We cannot accept responsibility for any loss as a result of acts or omissions taken in respect of this article.
Related insights
Give your life a legal spring clean
Life admin has a habit of slipping to the bottom of the to‑do list, but with Spring on the horizon, it’s the perfect time to refresh your legal affairs and…
Read moreSupreme Court landmark ruling reshapes unfair prejudice shareholder disputes
The Supreme Court has delivered an important judgment in THG plc v Zedra Trust Company (Jersey) Ltd, confirming that petitions under section 994 of the Companies Act 2006 are not…
Read moreSupreme Court ruling strengthens liquidators’ claims in Mitchell v Al Jaber
The decision of the Supreme Court in Mitchell v Sheikh Mohamed Bin Issa Al Jaber strengthens liquidators’ ability to pursue equitable compensation against directors for breach of their fiduciary duties….
Read moreHigh Court confirms liquidators cannot limit statutory liability
The High Court has provided important clarification on a question that has long carried practical significance for insolvency practitioners: can a liquidator limit their personal liability through contractual terms? In…
Read moreCommercial Court dismisses bank’s costs challenge following Debenhams Ottaway win
Debenhams Ottaway has successfully defended clients in a major Commercial Court costs dispute arising from long-running High Court proceedings brought by Invest Bank P.S.C. The bank had sued multiple defendants,…
Read more