Before negotiations can start about how finances should be shared between a divorcing couple, disclosure needs to be provided by both parties to establish what the finances are. This is usually done using a form called a form E, which includes a question about whether there are any other relevant circumstances, which may affect the outcome, such as inheritance prospects.
It is rare that inheritance prospects will have an impact on the way finances are divided upon divorce. Wills change and assets may be needed to fund residential care. However, in a recent case, the Court of Appeal had to review a decision by the High Court to limit the wife’s award because she was expected to receive a substantial inheritance in the future. The parties were married for 14 years and had three children. The husband had an earning capacity of £350,000 and assets of £15million. The wife looked after the children and had no assets but she received financial support from her father, a very wealthy Saudi businessman. In addition to a lump sum of £2million, the judge ordered that the wife have sole occupation of two London flats until her remarriage or her father’s death, whichever was sooner.
This case was unusual because Saudi “forced heirship” laws meant the wife’s inheritance prospects were certain. However, notwithstanding this, the Court of Appeal allowed the wife’s appeal, ruling that in a case where the assets were substantial such as this, the wife should receive sufficient capital from the divorce to enable her to rehouse outright in her own name. This reasoning begs the question whether the appeal would have been dismissed if the matrimonial assets were so much less requiring the wife to rely upon the inheritance she was to receive in the future. However, even though the inheritance may have been a certainty, the wife’s father’s life expectancy was not. Therefore, to determine a financial order based on inheritance prospects to be received at some unknown point in the future would be unfair.
The outcome may differ if a divorcing spouse is about to receive an inheritance imminently. If such inheritance prospects are not disclosed but are later discovered, the other spouse may have a case that the financial order should be revisited. They may succeed in seeking a more favourable outcome because their former spouse now has other resources available to them.
The contents of this article are intended for general information purposes only and shall not be deemed to be, or constitute legal advice. We cannot accept responsibility for any loss as a result of acts or omissions taken in respect of this article.
Related insights
Employment Rights Act 2025: Lessons learnt and what’s next
Join Employment Lawyers Louise Attrup and Michael Kerrigan for an interactive presentation and roundtable discussion exploring the key elements of the Employment Rights Act 2025 that employers need to know…
Read morePutting clients first: Debenhams Ottaway recognised in Chambers High Net Worth Guide 2026
Trusted legal advisers to wealthy clients, praised for personal service, strong relationships and clear advice. Clients and professional advisers have once again recognised Debenhams Ottaway in the Chambers High Net…
Read moreSupreme Court clarifies directors’ duties: good intentions are not enough
The Supreme Court’s recent decision in Saxon Woods Investments Ltd v Costa provides an important reminder that directors cannot justify improper conduct simply by saying they believed they were acting…
Read moreSupporting families and the Radlett community this Summer
Debenhams Ottaway is proud to be supporting two community events in Radlett this summer, helping local families enjoy free activities during the school holidays. We are sponsoring Films in the…
Read moreEmployment Rights Act 2025: key changes employers should prepare for
The Employment Rights Act 2025 is one of the biggest changes to UK employment law in a generation. Some changes are already in force, with further reforms being introduced throughout…
Read more