The Competition and Markets Authority (CMA) has recently published an open letter providing guidance to PR and marketing companies on online reviews and endorsements of consumer products and services. This follows the CMA’s investigation into how online reviews and endorsements are being used and whether this use complies with consumer protection laws.
Online reviews play an important role in helping potential customers decide whether to buy a product or service. Writing or commissioning fake reviews could lead to civil or criminal action. Once discovered, it can also damage the image of the brand and erode customers’ trust in reviews and review sites.
The CMA has already taken action against an online marketing company that posted fake reviews on behalf of small business clients and posted them on different websites.
In their recent guidance they highlight two areas of concern
Clearly labelling or identifying paid promotions
Businesses should ensure that it is obvious to readers when articles or blogs feature paid promotions, by clearly identifying or labelling paid promotions, providing clear instructions to marketing agencies, and ensuring that all policies on paid promotions reflect the requirements of consumer protection law.
Writing, commissioning and publishing fake reviews
Businesses should not offer inducements to customers in return for positive reviews and not pretend to be a customer and write fake reviews. If customers are invited to provide feedback this must be done honestly, as misleading readers may breach consumer protection laws.
The contents of this article are intended for general information purposes only and shall not be deemed to be, or constitute legal advice. We cannot accept responsibility for any loss as a result of acts or omissions taken in respect of this article.
Related insights
Supreme Court landmark ruling reshapes unfair prejudice shareholder disputes
The Supreme Court has delivered an important judgment in THG plc v Zedra Trust Company (Jersey) Ltd, confirming that petitions under section 994 of the Companies Act 2006 are not…
Read moreCommercial Court dismisses bank’s costs challenge following Debenhams Ottaway win
Debenhams Ottaway has successfully defended clients in a major Commercial Court costs dispute arising from long-running High Court proceedings brought by Invest Bank P.S.C. The bank had sued multiple defendants,…
Read moreClarifying the good arguable case test in freezing injunctions: Isabel dos Santos v Unitel
The judgment handed down by the Court of Appeal in Isabel dos Santos v Unitel [2024] EWCA Civ 1109 provides significant clarification on the test for obtaining a freezing injunction….
Read more-
“Can a company assert privilege over its legal advice against a shareholder only where litigation privilege is established, or from the time that the interests of the company and shareholder…
Read more -
The dispute resolution team at Debenhams Ottaway, together with counsel Richard Bottomley of Maitland Chambers, acted for Pheasantland Ltd, the successful first defendant in this claim. The High Court has…
Read more