The Government has made its ninth amendment to insolvency fees under the Insolvency Proceedings (Fees) (Amendment) Order 2015 (SI 2015/1819). The costs of presenting a bankruptcy or winding-up petition will increase for petitions presented on or after 16 November 2015 as follows
| Petition | Creditors’ bankruptcy petition | Compulsory winding up |
| Current deposit | £750 | £1,250 |
| Deposit from 16 November 2015 | £825 | £1,350 |
| Current remaining OR fees | £1,100 | £1,150 |
| Remaining OR fees from 16 November 2015 | £1,165 | £1,170 |
The costs for a debtor’s own bankruptcy petition have not changed.
There is also an increase to the Secretary of State administration fee levied on the realisations paid into the insolvency services account. The calculation of this levy has been adjusted, apart from the overall cap of £80,000 which remains the same.
| Amount of asset realisations | Current levy | Levy from 16 November 2015 |
| First £2,000 (£2,500 for liquidations) | 0% | No change |
| Next £1,700 | 100% | 75% |
| Next £1,500 | 75% | 50% |
| Next £396,000 | 15% | No change |
| Remainder up to a maximum levy of £80,000 | 1% | No change |
According to the Government, the main objective is to increase fees in order to eliminate deficits and cover costs. The intended effect is a shift from taxpayers subsidising the operational deficit to increasing income which will aid full cost (but no more) recovery.
The other objective is to reduce the reliance on cross subsidisation of cases and arrange for income from individual cases to more closely match costs. Here the intended effect is to create a fairer and more transparent funding structure for Official Receiver cases.
The contents of this article are intended for general information purposes only and shall not be deemed to be, or constitute legal advice. We cannot accept responsibility for any loss as a result of acts or omissions taken in respect of this article.
Related insights
Help! I think my company is insolvent, what may happen next?
Insolvency can be a challenging and stressful situation for any company (and its directors). However, taking prompt action and understanding your options can help protect your business, creditors, stakeholders and…
Read more-
Balancing arbitration and insolvency: Privy Council overrules Re Salford Estates in landmark decision Arbitration clauses in loan agreements can serve to facilitate the resolution of certain disputes in a more…
Read more Thames Water restructuring: Battle of bondholders over emergency loan
Thames Water has long been struggling to raise equity to enable them to continue to operate. During a hearing in December 2024, two classes of bondholders disputed the company’s proposed £3billion…
Read moreLimits of Insolvency Act section 236 applications: Lessons from Webb v Eversholt Rail Limited
When a company enters insolvency proceedings, liquidators are often left without a complete set of records detailing the company’s operations. To address this, section 236 of the Insolvency Act 1986…
Read moreLeading litigator Juliet Schalker honoured with IWIRC Excellence Award
Debenhams Ottaway is proud to announce that partner Juliet Schalker is the recipient of the 2024 IWIRC (International Women’s Insolvency & Restructuring Confederation) London Network Award for Excellence. This award…
Read more