When is it appropriate for the media to report financial details of a divorce? This question was addressed by Mr Justice Mostyn of the High Court recently in relation to the divorce between Nicole Appleton and Liam Gallagher.
In his judgment, Mostyn J observed that “to say that the law about the ability of the press to report ancillary relief proceedings which they are allowed to observe is a mess would be a serious understatement”. The Family Procedure Rules state that financial remedy hearings, where the court decides how to split the money and property of a divorced couple, should be private but allow journalists to attend. Beyond this, the current law does not make it clear when the right of the public to know and understand what is happening in courts funded by tax payers trumps the right of the divorcing couple who want to keep their personal details private.
Mostyn J’s view is that journalists may attend hearings but their reporting must not identify the names and locations of the parties or reveal any of their financial information, save to the extent the information is already in the public domain. Whilst the risk of information being reported might put pressure on a party to settle, it may also have the effect of preventing open disclosure of financial information within proceedings. Given the effectiveness of financial remedy proceedings depends greatly on both parties being completely open and honest about their financial position, this is a serious consideration.
The alternative for wealthy, well-known couples who are divorcing is to settle their finances outside of the court. Various options are available including mediation and arbitration as well as the traditional approach of negotiating through lawyers. Whilst most cases settle outside of court, there will always be a minority of protracted cases, which won’t. In these circumstances thought has to be given to what steps can be taken to protect the privacy of high profile clients who might be of interest to the public.
The contents of this article are intended for general information purposes only and shall not be deemed to be, or constitute legal advice. We cannot accept responsibility for any loss as a result of acts or omissions taken in respect of this article.
Related insights
Employment Rights Act 2025: Lessons learnt and what’s next
Join Employment Lawyers Louise Attrup and Michael Kerrigan for an interactive presentation and roundtable discussion exploring the key elements of the Employment Rights Act 2025 that employers need to know…
Read morePutting clients first: Debenhams Ottaway recognised in Chambers High Net Worth Guide 2026
Trusted legal advisers to wealthy clients, praised for personal service, strong relationships and clear advice. Clients and professional advisers have once again recognised Debenhams Ottaway in the Chambers High Net…
Read moreSupreme Court clarifies directors’ duties: good intentions are not enough
The Supreme Court’s recent decision in Saxon Woods Investments Ltd v Costa provides an important reminder that directors cannot justify improper conduct simply by saying they believed they were acting…
Read moreSupporting families and the Radlett community this Summer
Debenhams Ottaway is proud to be supporting two community events in Radlett this summer, helping local families enjoy free activities during the school holidays. We are sponsoring Films in the…
Read moreEmployment Rights Act 2025: key changes employers should prepare for
The Employment Rights Act 2025 is one of the biggest changes to UK employment law in a generation. Some changes are already in force, with further reforms being introduced throughout…
Read more