When is it appropriate for the media to report financial details of a divorce? This question was addressed by Mr Justice Mostyn of the High Court recently in relation to the divorce between Nicole Appleton and Liam Gallagher.
In his judgment, Mostyn J observed that “to say that the law about the ability of the press to report ancillary relief proceedings which they are allowed to observe is a mess would be a serious understatement”. The Family Procedure Rules state that financial remedy hearings, where the court decides how to split the money and property of a divorced couple, should be private but allow journalists to attend. Beyond this, the current law does not make it clear when the right of the public to know and understand what is happening in courts funded by tax payers trumps the right of the divorcing couple who want to keep their personal details private.
Mostyn J’s view is that journalists may attend hearings but their reporting must not identify the names and locations of the parties or reveal any of their financial information, save to the extent the information is already in the public domain. Whilst the risk of information being reported might put pressure on a party to settle, it may also have the effect of preventing open disclosure of financial information within proceedings. Given the effectiveness of financial remedy proceedings depends greatly on both parties being completely open and honest about their financial position, this is a serious consideration.
The alternative for wealthy, well-known couples who are divorcing is to settle their finances outside of the court. Various options are available including mediation and arbitration as well as the traditional approach of negotiating through lawyers. Whilst most cases settle outside of court, there will always be a minority of protracted cases, which won’t. In these circumstances thought has to be given to what steps can be taken to protect the privacy of high profile clients who might be of interest to the public.
The contents of this article are intended for general information purposes only and shall not be deemed to be, or constitute legal advice. We cannot accept responsibility for any loss as a result of acts or omissions taken in respect of this article.
Related insights
Family mediation: helping separating couples move forward with confidence
When a relationship breaks down, the legal issues are often only one part of what people are dealing with. Divorce, separation, financial arrangements and decisions about children can all bring…
Read moreDebenhams Ottaway charity quiz raises £5,640 for The OLLIE Foundation
Debenhams Ottaway has raised £5,640 for suicide prevention and wellbeing charity The OLLIE Foundation after bringing local businesses together for a charity quiz night at St Michael’s Manor in St…
Read moreHow do estate executors remove a caveat from probate?
If you are an executor dealing with a caveat, you may be unsure what it means for probate and how to move the estate forward. This article explains what a…
Read moreDebenhams Ottaway strengthens specialist Wills, trusts and inheritance disputes expertise
Debenhams Ottaway is expanding its contentious probate, Wills, trusts and inheritance disputes capability in response to growing demand from clients and professional advisers for specialist support with sensitive, complex and…
Read moreEmployment Rights Act 2025: Lessons learnt and what’s next
Join Employment Lawyers Louise Attrup and Michael Kerrigan for an interactive presentation and roundtable discussion exploring the key elements of the Employment Rights Act 2025 that employers need to know…
Read more