On 27 February 2014 the Law Commission produced its long awaited report recommending changes to the law, including legislation to make qualifying nuptial agreements legally binding.
The changes are not limited to nuptial agreements. The commission calls on the government to fund the production of guidance from the Family Justice Council to inform divorcing couples as to how the courts will approach and decide their case based on their financial needs. They believe that this will provide a more certain outcome for people who are separating and address the regional inconsistencies that exist in the courts’ approach to issues relating to financial needs.
This concept of financial needs is relevant to nuptial agreements. If legislation is introduced, couples will be able to enter into qualifying nuptial agreements which will be enforceable as contracts, but will only be enforceable after the parties’ financial needs and any financial responsibilities towards their children have been met. Lawyers will need to ensure that the parties agree what their needs are and record this information in any agreement that is prepared. It may still be an issue that will be the subject of litigation at the time of separation.
The other formal requirements that are recommended are
- a valid agreement entered into without undue influence or misrepresentation
- a statement from each party to confirm they understand they are signing a deed which will partially remove the courts’ powers to make financial orders
- an agreement must be executed at least 28 days before the wedding or civil partnership
- both parties must have fully disclosed their financial situation
- both parties must have received independent legal advice.
The Law Commission has drafted a bill to give effect to their recommendations. It remains to be seen whether the government will act and introduce the legislation they recommend.
The contents of this article are intended for general information purposes only and shall not be deemed to be, or constitute legal advice. We cannot accept responsibility for any loss as a result of acts or omissions taken in respect of this article.
Related insights
National Pet Day: Why pet owners should think about a pet‑nup
As the UK celebrates National Pet Day this month, it’s the perfect moment to celebrate the animals who brighten our lives – and to think practically about their wellbeing should…
Read morePre-nups to protect your wealth: A lesson learned for Jeff Bezos
As Amazon founder Jeff Bezos prepares to tie the knot with Lauren Sánchez in what’s shaping up to be one of the most extravagant weddings in recent years, one detail…
Read moreThe Split Barcelona: a last minute pre-nup and a race to issue divorce proceedings
It’s been over two years since BBC’s The Split left our screens, and since our family and divorce lawyers wrote their last blog on the show that centres around the…
Read moreDivorce reform: An outline of the review dealing with the financial aspects of divorce
The Law Commission has launched a review of the principles for financial provision following a divorce under the Matrimonial Causes Act 1973. This comes one year after “no fault divorce”…
Read morePaws for thought – are pet-nups the new pre-nup?
When a couple separate, often the focus turns to dealing with the finances, property, and the parenting of any children, but what happens to the pets? With the rise in…
Read more