Debenhams Ottaway were recently involved in an Employment Tribunal case which could affect the employment rights of thousands of peripatetic teachers across the UK.
In the case of Scott v Chigwell School and Others, Michael Kerrigan acted on behalf of Mrs Scott, a music teacher, who had previously worked at the private school. The hearing, to consider the employment status of Mrs Scott and whether she could proceed with various claims against the school and others, found that Mrs Scott, who was engaged by the school to provide services to pupils and parents should be recognised as a worker and was not genuinely self-employed. This was despite the fact that the contract between the parties stated that Mrs Scott was self-employed.
The ruling means that Mrs Scott should have been afforded certain rights and protections whilst teaching at the school such as holiday pay, national minimum wage and whistle-blower protections and protection from discrimination under the Equality Act 2010.
The ruling handed down by Employment Judge Moor at the East London Hearing Centre opens the way for peripatetic teachers nationwide to be awarded the same rights and protections if they are engaged by a school to provide music tuition during the school day, even if the lessons are paid for directly by the parents and even if their contracts state that they are self-employed.
Commenting on the case Michael Kerrigan of Debenhams Ottaway said:
“This is a landmark ruling that has implications for both schools and individual teaching staff affording them similar rights to those of full time staff. It is a further reminder that Employment Tribunals, when considering the employment status of an individual, will look beyond the wording of contracts and will look at the reality of the relationship between the parties”
Debenhams Ottaway Employment team Partner Louise Attrup said:
“I anticipate that this ruling could result in other cases coming before tribunals. In addition to this we are recommending that schools, colleges and other learning based organisations look closely at their terms and conditions of employment/appointment.”
Debenhams Ottaway instructed specialist employment barrister Mugni Islam-Choudhury, of No5 Barristers’ Chambers to represent Mrs Scott at the Employment Tribunal hearing.
The contents of this article are intended for general information purposes only and shall not be deemed to be, or constitute legal advice. We cannot accept responsibility for any loss as a result of acts or omissions taken in respect of this article.
Related insights
Debenhams Ottaway’s Employment Law Round Up January 2026
Click the links below to read more about some upcoming changes in employment law next month: Employment Rights Bill 2025 gains Royal Assent: Key considerations for employers Rates and limits…
Read moreChristmas party season: An employer’s guide
With the festive season fast approaching, many organisations are gearing up for Christmas parties. These gatherings, whether held on-site or off, during or outside work hours, are treated as an…
Read moreDebenhams Ottaway’s Employment Law Round Up September 2025
Click the links below to read more about some upcoming changes in employment law next month: Government u-turn on re-introducing employment tribunal fees Government responds to Women and Equalities Committee…
Read moreDebenhams Ottaway’s Employment Law Round Up August 2025
Click the links below to read more about the changes in employment law in August: Government launches “WorkWell” pilot to support 56,000 people with health conditions back into work Impact…
Read moreDebenhams Ottaway’s Employment Law Round Up July 2025
Click the links below to read more about the changes in employment law for July 2025: Council liable for race discrimination – Court of Appeal upholds tribunal’s decision EAT: Tribunal…
Read more