A recent case has confirmed that the Agency Worker Regulations 2010 (AWR) do not entitle agency workers to equal treatment in being considered for directly employed vacancies. The end user is also only obliged to inform agency workers of such vacancies.
Under AWR Regulation 13 “An agency worker has during an assignment the right to be informed by the hirer of any relevant vacant posts with the hirer, to give that agency worker the same opportunity as a comparable worker to find permanent employment with the hirer.”
In the case of Coles v Ministry of Defence, Mr Coles was an agency worker supplied by an agency to the MOD (end user). The MOD undertook a restructure and as a result 530 of their employees were placed into a redeployment pool and given priority status for vacancies at their existing grade.
The work Mr Coles performed was advertised internally as a vacant post and was visible to all internal staff including agency workers. Mr Coles did not look at the advertisement and did not apply for the vacancy. An internal applicant with priority status applied for the position and was successful. As a result Mr Coles’ assignment was terminated.
Mr Coles brought claims for breach of AWR alleging the MOD had failed to allow him access to the details of the vacancy and had denied him the opportunity to apply for the role. The Employment Tribunal (ET) and the Employment Appeals Tribunal (EAT) both decided that regulation 13 only related to providing information on vacancies and did not require an end user to consider agency workers on an equal footing with existing employees. Mr Coles’ right to equal treatment in basic working and employment conditions had not been breached and the MOD was entitled to give priority to employees who were at risk of redundancy over agency workers.
The outcome appears to be a common sense interpretation of AWR regulation 13 and will be welcomed by end user clients and employment businesses.
Debenhams Ottaway is an REC legal business partner. We advise recruitment agencies of all shapes and sizes across the UK.
The contents of this article are intended for general information purposes only and shall not be deemed to be, or constitute legal advice. We cannot accept responsibility for any loss as a result of acts or omissions taken in respect of this article.
Related insights
Celebrating International Women’s Day 2026 and its powerful #GiveToGain theme
Debenhams Ottaway is proud to celebrate International Women’s Day 2026, a moment to recognise the extraordinary women who shape our firm, our profession and our local business community. As a…
Read more-
Debenhams Ottaway is delighted to share that managing partner Susan Glenholme has been appointed the new President of the St Albans District Chamber of Commerce, stepping into the role with…
Read more Supreme Court landmark ruling reshapes unfair prejudice shareholder disputes
The Supreme Court has delivered an important judgment in THG plc v Zedra Trust Company (Jersey) Ltd, confirming that petitions under section 994 of the Companies Act 2006 are not…
Read moreSupreme Court ruling strengthens liquidators’ claims in Mitchell v Al Jaber
The decision of the Supreme Court in Mitchell v Sheikh Mohamed Bin Issa Al Jaber strengthens liquidators’ ability to pursue equitable compensation against directors for breach of their fiduciary duties….
Read moreFamily Mediation Week 2026: A Smarter Way to Navigate Divorce
Family Mediation Week shines a spotlight on mediation as a practical, forward-focused alternative to court during separation and divorce. For many couples facing divorce, mediation offers a way to resolve…
Read more