A recent case has confirmed that the Agency Worker Regulations 2010 (AWR) do not entitle agency workers to equal treatment in being considered for directly employed vacancies. The end user is also only obliged to inform agency workers of such vacancies.
Under AWR Regulation 13 “An agency worker has during an assignment the right to be informed by the hirer of any relevant vacant posts with the hirer, to give that agency worker the same opportunity as a comparable worker to find permanent employment with the hirer.”
In the case of Coles v Ministry of Defence, Mr Coles was an agency worker supplied by an agency to the MOD (end user). The MOD undertook a restructure and as a result 530 of their employees were placed into a redeployment pool and given priority status for vacancies at their existing grade.
The work Mr Coles performed was advertised internally as a vacant post and was visible to all internal staff including agency workers. Mr Coles did not look at the advertisement and did not apply for the vacancy. An internal applicant with priority status applied for the position and was successful. As a result Mr Coles’ assignment was terminated.
Mr Coles brought claims for breach of AWR alleging the MOD had failed to allow him access to the details of the vacancy and had denied him the opportunity to apply for the role. The Employment Tribunal (ET) and the Employment Appeals Tribunal (EAT) both decided that regulation 13 only related to providing information on vacancies and did not require an end user to consider agency workers on an equal footing with existing employees. Mr Coles’ right to equal treatment in basic working and employment conditions had not been breached and the MOD was entitled to give priority to employees who were at risk of redundancy over agency workers.
The outcome appears to be a common sense interpretation of AWR regulation 13 and will be welcomed by end user clients and employment businesses.
Debenhams Ottaway is an REC legal business partner. We advise recruitment agencies of all shapes and sizes across the UK.
The contents of this article are intended for general information purposes only and shall not be deemed to be, or constitute legal advice. We cannot accept responsibility for any loss as a result of acts or omissions taken in respect of this article.
Related insights
Do I need a solicitor if the assets in our marital pot are straightforward?
When separating from a spouse or civil partner, it can be tempting to assume that legal advice is unnecessary if there are only modest assets involved. Many people believe that…
Read moreDebenhams Ottaway recognised as one of the 2026 eprivateclient Top Law Firms
Debenhams Ottaway’s private client team has been recognised as one of the 2026 eprivateclient Top Law Firms, marking the sixth consecutive year the team has received the accolade. Published annually,…
Read moreInheritance disputes: 4 top tips if you are considering making an Inheritance claim
The loss of a loved one is never easy. Learning that you have not been adequately provided for under their estate can add further distress, particularly where this results in…
Read moreTrusted expertise and client insight drive improved Chambers UK 2027 rankings
Debenhams Ottaway has achieved another strong set of results in Chambers UK 2027. The results follow our recent Legal 500 2027 success, where every ranking was maintained, and the Chambers…
Read moreLiquidators’ challenge to Co‑op restructuring fails: Key lessons on undervalue and preference claims
Liquidators challenged a 2015 restructuring that stripped assets out of Food Retailer Operations Limited (FRO) before its insolvency, arguing undervalue and preference. The court had to determine the nature of…
Read more